Living life, just a few decades, almost also did not understand the whole, had they age. I compare love to want things such as the meaning of life, and childhood love thought, for decades, had never broken the want, even if it is so much deliberation, or think clearly. But the years and did not because I did not want to understand matter waiting for me, and even none of the speed of the passage of a marginal decrease in the how fast or how quickly bolted to the end.
No too selfish? Whether it will harm others? Or at least not to help others? Not. Because of injury to others, do not have a good feeling; help others, if it is their wish, they themselves would have a good feeling. This is Chernyshevsky famous "how to do" rational egoism "is that it is the difference between altruism, which is purely altruistic, while the former while altruistic self-interest, it is good feeling to to be altruistic. I do not deny that Mother Teresa as noble people in the world, but she is a saint, and the very people, the vast majority of people are just ordinary people. Most people do not a saint, saint also do not have to do. Therefore, I have confidence: rational egoism and I gather honey philosophy is suitable for ordinary people's life philosophy.
Meaning, significance. Like a lifetime, still have not figured out what is the point. Which in the vast universe, so a little Earth, like the one in which a monkey sesame sesame; Among the vast sea, so a little, which is like a monkey sesame sesame seed. My life can have what implications does it? Even those wealthy tycoons who dictates of senior officials, those million people watched the star, but also in a sesame planet a sesame children can have Gesha significance of it?
Thought, you can not not become calm, and even despair. Life will seem extremely small, bleak, cold, lonely, insignificant, non-essential. All the things that are not worth pursuing; emotions, feelings, emotions, are not necessary. So why go on living? Since death is the ultimate goal of all, why should we live?
No reason. Nothing is. Alive just a state, like a fish, a tree, a Beetle. We came into the world, we consumed some substance to change some of the surrounding substances, and then died. Even the great man Mao Zedong said, he changed just west of Beijing that place it, the World Few can match his, the vast majority of people almost everything has not changed to an untimely death. Speaking of changing the surrounding material, I think Liu Liang Cheng rural life: the first person to write "I carry a shovel in the ground, dug a pit then Yangtianzhangtan: This is what I can change things.
No too selfish? Whether it will harm others? Or at least not to help others? Not. Because of injury to others, do not have a good feeling; help others, if it is their wish, they themselves would have a good feeling. This is Chernyshevsky famous "how to do" rational egoism "is that it is the difference between altruism, which is purely altruistic, while the former while altruistic self-interest, it is good feeling to to be altruistic. I do not deny that Mother Teresa as noble people in the world, but she is a saint, and the very people, the vast majority of people are just ordinary people. Most people do not a saint, saint also do not have to do. Therefore, I have confidence: rational egoism and I gather honey philosophy is suitable for ordinary people's life philosophy.
That being the case, what we face this sesame life it? The only thing I would like to understand is to spend his life more comfortable and happy state. Although in the eyes of God, I am just a sesame but this little life for me, but it is my all, my whole world. My body is my all, my feeling is my all. My body is comfortable, my spirit is joy, this is the full meaning of my existence. Accordingly, I have invented a philosophy of life, that collect nectar philosophy: I like a bee, the entire contents of my life is just collecting nectar. I am in the flowers, just to occasionally pick flowers in essence. This is what Heidegger called "poetic dwelling." Whether it is material life, spiritual life, emotional life just that little bit of the essence, the most beautiful, most comfortable, most poetic, most suitable for me. Alive to enjoy all these feelings; died, said good-bye to all of these feelings. This is the full meaning of my life.
This way of life is too selfish? Whether it will harm others? Or at least not to help others? Not. Because of injury to others, do not have a good feeling; help others, if it is their wish, they themselves would have a good feeling. This is Chernyshevsky famous "how to do" rational egoism "is that it is the difference between altruism, which is purely altruistic, while the former while altruistic self-interest, it is good feeling to to be altruistic.
I do not deny that Mother Teresa as noble people in the world, but she is a saint, and the very people, the vast majority of people are just ordinary people. Most people do not a saint, saint also do not have to do. Therefore, I have confidence: rational egoism and I gather honey philosophy is suitable for ordinary people's life philosophy.
没有评论:
发表评论