Hebei Cangxian the Zhang Guanzhun Township a small zhuzhuang groundwater becomes red, nearly 800 chickens died after drinking. The villagers even the underground 400 meters to hit the the well water nor Ganhe, because pink. Village within a 5 km radius of only one to build a new chemical plant, the production of dye intermediates. The this chemical Although discontinued, but there are some very dark in color industrial wastewater plant in the region.
Cangxian EPA Secretary Denglian Jun has an interview with CCTV said, not sure yet the farmers dead chickens sewage and chemical plants related to "red water is not equal to the non-compliance of the water, some of the red water, substances that color, for instance, we put a red beans, boiled rice may be red, not equal to the non-compliance. "
The lovely environmental protection bureau was followed some officials to tamper with the concept of "good" habits. You see, this way, can be derived out of such a problem-solving ideas: because red beans soup nontoxic, empathy can push, the groundwater small zhuzhuang red may be non-toxic.
The topic suspected "solution" came out, but obviously a little "confused logic. Because whenever a little life the common sense of the environmental protection bureau, it is impossible to draw such a perverse conclusion.
Based on this, I believe that it is necessary to make up for the Secretary lesson: the water plus Red Bean cooked red color is yes, but red is the inevitable result of the oxidation of the food cooking process. In other words, red beans cooked soup is red, but this soup for thousands of years has been proved toxic to humans. The problem is, groundwater small zhuzhuang red, the food cooking process is not a normal oxidation process? I am afraid to say that breaking the big day no one will believe.
We also note that, in the reply of the Secretary of God, "does not mean non-compliance" leave room for argument. In other words, he is still confused "red water" whether toxic. Since it can not be ascertained, it should be the spirit of a responsible attitude to life, rather than the ambiguous explanation "does not mean non-compliance" to Fudge and misleading local people. Otherwise, the case-Which Kuanye users excited, offering a reward of a hundred and eighty million of his old taste "Features" well, in order to permit the "innocence" of the body of the local groundwater, that time may not quite easy to handle (Friendly reminder: the official position is precious, life is even more. pull call dangerous, I cover your first withdrawal).
Some officials in the blind pursuit of GDP data in the process of rapid economic development, to be the face and do not in sub-appear some damage to the environment as a consideration of the "myopic" behavior, while these "myopic" behavior to us brought a painful lesson. The question is not the most terrible, the most terrible apathy and not as a problem of inertia.
800 dead chickens, I do not know is poisoned or "avian flu" death, you can excuse; 30 villagers carcinogenicity pollution pathogenic own physical poor, large can shirk. But increasingly cramped environment, the public is more and polish his eyes, the relevant departments afraid I can not be "Chuaizhuo understand loaded confused".
According to the latest news, the Secretary has been removed from office. This is undoubtedly an uplifting message, but the author's heart would be more heavy. After all, the problem of environmental pollution is not a free twelve Secretary can lightly solve. Including the relevant departments, including each of our citizens, have the necessary responsibility and role. My question is, in this responsibility and to play in front of each individual can stand history, posterity responsible height sign papers in the book of this commitment to protect the environment?
没有评论:
发表评论